Passive Earth · Tree Guardian — back to home

The savings model

A conservative model — every assumption named and sourced

Vancouver as the worked example, built from public Park Board data and peer-reviewed literature, with every assumption at the floor of what the evidence supports. The pilot replaces these modelled values with measured ones.

+10 ptsprojected survival lift — 30% → 20% mortality vs. matched control
200trees saved per year at Vancouver's 2,000 trees/yr volume
$440Kprojected annual savings — $240K labour + $200K mortality
50%projected reduction in crew watering visits — 8 saved per tree

What Vancouver's own numbers say

Street trees planted per year2,000Park Board memo — 19,672 over 10 years
Five-year establishment mortality30%Hilbert et al. 2019 — 56-study peer-reviewed review
Watering cadence, published guidanceTwice weeklyUrban Forest Strategy
Watering cadence, operational realityBiweekly2021 Park Board memo — 2-week route turnaround
Annual establishment leak$1.2–2M600 lost trees × $2,000, plus removal and replanting

The gap between the published cadence and the operational one is the mortality driver. A standard surface bag empties in 5–9 hours; Tree Guardian meters the same fill across the full window between visits.

One fill, ten days — where the water goes

Both systems get the same fill on day zero. A standard surface bag empties in 5–9 hours and the soil dries by day two. Tree Guardian meters the same water into the root zone: seven days inside the target band, then a three-day buffer above the stress threshold.

root-zone target band drought-stress threshold crew fill — day 0 7-day refill target 3-day buffer 0246810 days after one crew fill Tree Guardian standard surface bag — empty in 5–9 hours

Two levers, added together

Lever 1 — Watering labour

Visits per tree, 2-year establishment16 → 8
Labour saved per tree (8 × $15 conservative rate)$120
4,000 trees in establishment × $60/yr$240,000/yr

Lever 2 — Mortality reduction

Trees saved per year (10% × 2,000)200
Saved per tree — half of $2,000 establishment cost$1,000
200 trees × $1,000$200,000/yr
$440K/yrcombined, at today's volume
~$1.45M/yrat the 2050 target of 6,600 trees/yr
~$3.7Mover 5 years at current volume
~$24.4Mover 10 years at target volume

How the $440K moves under different assumptions

ScenarioVisit reductionSurvival liftVisit costAnnual savings
Pessimistic floor30%5 pts$15$244,000
Conservative — this model50%10 pts$15$440,000
Realistic — loaded crew rate50%10 pts$25$600,000
Strong outcome60%15 pts$25$780,000
Optimistic ceiling — full crew + truck rate60%15 pts$40$1,068,000

The conservative case sits in the bottom third of the realistic envelope: the $15/visit rate is well below the Park Board's loaded crew-and-truck cost, and even the pessimistic floor clears $244K a year.

Where the need is greatest

Dot size = trees planted per year; colour = estimated young-tree mortality. Click any dot for its numbers — estimates apply city canopy and heat data from Vancouver's 2025 Urban Forest Strategy and are illustrative.

Highest-priority neighbourhoods

Strathcona9% canopy~45% est. loss
Downtown13% canopy~42% est. loss
Sunset14% canopy~40% est. loss
Renfrew-Collingwood16% canopy~38% est. loss
Victoria-Fraserview16% canopy~38% est. loss

The lowest-canopy neighbourhoods are the hottest, the driest, and the hardest on a newly planted tree — the same places the 2021 heat dome hit hardest. They are where the pilot starts, and where every saved tree counts double.

The break-even math

One failed street tree costs the City about $3,250 — $2,000 of establishment (planting plus two years of watering) and $1,250 to remove the failure and replant the site. At pilot pricing of $250 per kit, a single avoided failure covers thirteen trees' worth of kits.

The replacement tree's own watering is counted in its own establishment, so nothing is double-counted. Pilot kits $250 per tree; volume pricing $150.

Heat is the stress test

During the 2021 heat dome BC recorded 619 heat-related deaths (BCCDC) and Vancouver lost 800+ trees. Peer-reviewed analysis found every 5% of added canopy cuts heat-death risk by 9% (Henderson et al. 2022). Tree Guardian holds root-zone moisture through multi-week heat events — exactly when crews can't reach every tree.

Put the model to the test — the pilot measures every one of these numbers.

Book a 30-minute call Pilot details →